Which sources we use
We prefer the developer's public game pages, FAQ and announcements. Public implementation details can help verify a current score value or date rule, but are labelled as observations rather than a permanent specification.
Search results, community reports and research agents can identify questions worth investigating. They do not automatically establish a game fact. Where a report conflicts with the current first-party source, we investigate the difference and keep the published claim within what is supported.
We link sources near material claims so readers can check them. A source URL is evidence of a particular statement, not permission to reproduce a full question set.
Drafting and calculation checks
Our workflow uses AI-assisted drafting followed by source checks and editing for scope, clarity and unsupported claims. We do not invent credentials, named reviewers, a separate human fact-checking department or personal play experience.
For the score calculator, expected arithmetic examples and boundary checks cover completed misses, unplayed rounds, maximum scores, reached targets and impossible targets. These checks verify the implemented mathematics; they do not verify a written answer against the official game.
Hypothetical examples are labelled. We distinguish editorial suggestions from tested performance claims and do not describe generated examples as real daily questions.
Changing rules and unknown information
A rule-check date tells you when the cited evidence was inspected. It is different from the date a paragraph was reformatted. We do not change dates simply to make old information appear new.
Scores, reset logic and access conditions may change. When evidence is incomplete, we narrow the statement or label the missing information. We do not turn an unknown search volume into zero, infer official rarity from arbitrary text or claim every possible answer is covered.
The initial release contains guides and a local score tool. Daily answers, historical answer collections and an answer checker require verified data before publication. We do not fill those gaps with invented entries.
Corrections and accountability
Report an issue through Contact & Corrections, ideally with the page, disputed statement and a source or reproducible example. We check the evidence and update, qualify or remove a confirmed error.
Material corrections receive a visible explanation where it helps readers understand the changed information. Routine spelling or layout edits do not need to imply a new factual review. We do not promise a fixed response deadline or independent audit of every submission.
Read About Krillion Trivia for our independent identity. This release has no advertising or paid placement; any future commercial feature would need appropriate disclosure and policy updates.